Suunto Watches Forums

Suunto Watches

Suunto Forum by SuuntoWatches.com

Water proof vs. water resistant once and for all...

This is a discussion on Water proof vs. water resistant once and for all... within the General Questions forums; Hello all, so here it is for my first post... Looking at the following link ( Recent Reviews ), I ...


Go Back   Suunto Watches Forums > Suunto Info > General Questions

Register FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-22-2007, 12:26 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: North of Montreal
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
clbriere is on a distinguished road
Water proof vs. water resistant once and for all...

Hello all, so here it is for my first post...

Looking at the following link (Recent Reviews), I found an unhappy Suunto Yachtsman user who explained he ended up catching water with his Yachtsman even though he did not go deeper than 72ft with a 30m water resistant Yachtsman. In response to the user's comments, an "expert" answered what follows:

"Hi Michael, the first thing I should let you know is that the Suunto watches are not water proof, they are water resistent to 100 ft..."

As far as I'm concerned, both expressions are equal although I tend to agree with one of this forum's 2002 users (Brad) who stated:

"water "resistant" means that. You can take it under water, but do NOT press any buttons. That's the real difference between water resistant and water proof. On a dive watch that is water proof, you can press buttons for function."

That seems to be the appropriate answer as opposed to that of the expert, is there something else I should know about water proof vs. water resistant? Shouldn't any Suunto 30m water resistant watch be good for AT LEAST 30m, hence justifying the user's concerns?

Thank you!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-23-2007, 08:50 PM
Tyler's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 181
Thanks: 7
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Rep Power: 100
Tyler has a reputation beyond reputeTyler has a reputation beyond reputeTyler has a reputation beyond reputeTyler has a reputation beyond reputeTyler has a reputation beyond reputeTyler has a reputation beyond reputeTyler has a reputation beyond reputeTyler has a reputation beyond reputeTyler has a reputation beyond reputeTyler has a reputation beyond reputeTyler has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Tyler Send a message via Yahoo to Tyler
water proof

In recent years (at least the past 10) I have never seen anything referred to as water proof. My guess is there is too much liability with a claim of water proof. Every watch I've owned has always been water resistant to a certain depth, even if it is a dive watch.

A Rolex is water resistant so long as you don't unscrew the crown to change the time. The same is true for non-dive Suunto instruments - they are not designed to be operated under heavy water pressure, even though they can take the pressure if you are not pushing the buttons. Suunto has a very successful dive line, which is specifically designed to operate under water.

I've never had a leak in any of my Suunto's, and have used them in the pool/shower etc - but when I go diving - I where a dive watch.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-26-2007, 01:49 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: North of Montreal
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
clbriere is on a distinguished road
Exclamation I still expect the warranty to be valid in case of a defect

Well perhaps I will never see a watch identified as "water proof" but, if I see "water resistant to 100m", I will still expect it to be capable of going down to that depth. If the watch goes berzerk near this depth, I would still expect the warranty to be effective. That might be the most important thing to check out before buying: warranty fine prints vs. indications engraved onto the bezel...

So for me, the difference between the 2 types of watches remains the same along with a distinction pertaining to the depth range one can reach as opposed to the other.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2007, 11:04 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
summit21 is on a distinguished road
Unhappy

I own a Suunto Vector, and had it serviced for condensation under the lens about 4 mos. back. Well just 2 days ago it had condensation under it again. I never wear it in the shower, nor swim in it, but still have condensation issues. I did wash my truck with it on the other day, the bucket was less than 1m deep. My watch is only 10 mos. old, so I am very dissappointed Suunto owner at this point. They serviced it very nicely the first time, even touching up scratches on the face and repainting the word suunto. A watch of this quality should not have these problems though. I will be contacting them on Monday morning, not sure if I will ever buy another Suunto though.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-31-2007, 07:25 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
cdmackay is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by clbriere View Post
Shouldn't any Suunto 30m water resistant watch be good for AT LEAST 30m, hence justifying the user's concerns?
Sadly. no. The "depth" quoted by all watch manufacturers in their water resistance claims has nothing to do with a physical water depth, but is instead indicative of the static pressure used during the successful pressure test.

Actually waving your arms around under water creates a dynamic water pressure far in excess of the static pressure extered by that depth of water.

For swimming (not diving) watches marked 100m are ok. But only as long as you don't press any of the buttons.

For button-pressing in a pool, or anything more demanding, including SCUBA, 200m marking should be the minimum considered, and even then I would get a watch that explicitly claims to be suitable for diving.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 12-10-2007, 11:28 PM
tzd tzd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
tzd is on a distinguished road
...interestingly enough, a search in wikipedia for water proof brings up a water resistant result...

Check it out:

Water Resistant mark - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Note the Water_Proof at the end of the URL.
__________________
Wrist Watches
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2000-2008, SuuntoWatches.com, All Rights Reserved

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22