Suunto Forum by SuuntoWatches.com
This is a discussion on Suunto T: EPOC Discussion (suunto t6 versus cardiosport gt5) within the t Series forums; There are two important features that the suunto T6 does not have compared to the cardiosport GT5. 1] Percentage of ...
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| |||
| Suunto T: EPOC Discussion (suunto t6 versus cardiosport gt5) There are two important features that the suunto T6 does not have compared to the cardiosport GT5. 1] Percentage of Fat Calories burnt 2] Time for HR recovery after a session. CardioSport GT5 heart rate monitor SUUNTO T6 - Suunto Heart Rate Monitors Suunto T6 with HRV I would have thought the above two are quiet important. Not too worried about not having the " Percentage of Fat Calories burnt " bit. But Time for HR recovery after a session is a must. Is there anything in the suunto T6 which allows me to work out this figure or is there something better in suunto T6. the cardiosport gt5 is also much cheaper than the suunto t6. Would be grateful for your help and comments. thank you. |
| The Following User Says Thank You to jack111 For This Useful Post: | ||
Tyler (04-17-2008) | ||
| |||
| vo2 max, training effect, epoc and other jargon By using jargon like EPOC and Training effect suunto are trying to make it look like they are giving information which cannot be calculated with heart rate. The suunto only measures the heart rate, R-R interval i.e duration of one beat, in other words heart rate. Apart from time of course. By looking at how long one stays in a particular heart rate zone one can easily find out if the workout has had a training effect. Of course these are approximations. i.e 70% MHR for half hour would induce a training effect in most people and 90% MHR for 10 minutes would do the same. Intensity / duration being the key variables. EPOC is derived from METS and the relationship between percentage max heart rate and Percentage VO2 max. %MHR %VO2 max 50 28 60 40 70 58 80 70 90 83 100 100 5 kcal equals approximately one litre of oxygen consumed. One can use this to work out millilitres of oxygen consumed per KG of body mass per minute. This can be used to work out resting oxygen consumption which is about 250 ml/min this is 1 MET . METs is multiples of resting metabolic rate. I think it boils down to personal choice of whether people prefer EPOC values as opposed to the value of the heart rate. I would personally perfer the raw data i.e the heart rate as the EPOC value is an approximation all be it quiet a accurate one. As regards training effort data all one would have to see is how long one has been in a particular heart rate zone. The suunto watches have to make an assumption on training duration. i.e if I excercised at 70% mhr how long before i achieve a training effect. so the duration is an approximation made by suunto. It would be useful if they could release this data. The more I think of it the more the cardiosport GT5 looks better. As it would allow me to see my heart rate getting back to recovery after each rally which usually lasts a few minutes as opposed to the entire session i.e about 45 minutes. Must add these suunto forums are great. And I welcome comments as to why EPOC or Training effect would be better. As for some unknown reason I want to buy the suunto and trying to justify it is better. Last edited by jack111; 04-14-2008 at 05:21 PM. |
| The Following User Says Thank You to jack111 For This Useful Post: | ||
Tyler (04-17-2008) | ||
| ||||
| There are may ways to analyze the load or the effect of a workout. But what Suunto has done by using EPOC based Training Effect is to give a user one number or goal to attain only once during a workout in order to improve their fitness. EPOC accumulation is based on intensity and duration as mentioned in the post but also includes a variable for Heart Rate Variation (time between heart beats) which can impact the accumulated EPOC differently as a result of the body being more or less fatigued -- so one day you might accumulate EPOC and Training Effect faster performing the same workout because of the HRV factor. The accumulated aerobic load or EPOC Peak is then descried relative to a users personalized measurement scale called Training Effect (if you train a lot and profile yourself accordingly with say 8.0 Activity Class it will require more EPOC accumulation to register a 3.0 or Improving effect on your TE scale than for someone who is not training regularly and enters 4.0 Activity Level). Looking to one number to accurately express and summarize the total impact of the session is in essence easier than training with your attention focused all the time on, "is my heart rate in the right zone". Again with Training Effect you only need to know one scale (1-5 training effect in increments of .1) and you only have to attain your Training Effect once during the workout for you to have the improved effect or benefit from the session. Tip: try training with Target Training Effect feature (t3 or t4) to see time to TE goal or next level at current heart rate intensity. Teaches a great deal about how TE moves based on EPOC accumulation. For more information on EPOC based Training Effect and the studies validating Suunto calculations visit Firstbeat Technologies - Home and look at the White Papers. |
| |||
| hrv thanks for the reply. Have visited firstbeat technologies and have read the dessertation as well. suunto watches measure just one variable i.e the R-R interval which all heart rate monitors do. nothing to the contrary said in your post. They use this i.e R-R interval or in other words heart rate to calcualte various things like epoc and training effect. Quote:
Heart rate variation in other words is fast heart rate or slow heart rate. |
| The Following User Says Thank You to jack111 For This Useful Post: | ||
Tyler (04-17-2008) | ||
| |||
| hrv vo2 max Hi tyler thank you for your reply but it has resulted in more querries. You state the vo2 max calculation using HRV is different to % mhr. Would be grateful if you could give me the links to where you got this information. As it would be interesting to know a] If there is any difference b] If there is which one is considered more accurate. HRV can be calculated one of two ways which way does suunto do them Heart rate variability as an indicator of exercise capacity - US Patent 6301499 Quote:
Quote:
Oxygen Debt EPOC is an area calculation. But of course if you exert enough you will have a steady increment in oxygen deficit which you could show as a straight line. using hrv does not change human physiology ! . when you say not all heart rate monitors do this. Can you be more precise, as all of them measure the RR interval. TE and EPOC are derived from this data. So the only data being measured is the RR interval and various manufacturers use the data differently. Last edited by jack111; 04-16-2008 at 06:05 PM. |
| The Following User Says Thank You to jack111 For This Useful Post: | ||
Tyler (04-17-2008) | ||
| ||||
| Heart rate vs. heart rate variability RR-I means the time in millisecond between two consequent heart beats. That is the only input that heart rate monitors takes out from the heart. Instead of showing the interval time in milliseconds, users are more familiarized watching the heart rate in beats/min value. So yes, every HR monitors measure RR-I. However, RR-I provides more information than just the pure heart rate. When analyzing the changes in RR-I times (heart rate variability, HRV), it is possible to detect different frequency bands (high, low, very low). These spectral components are the “subunits of the variation in RR-intervals and they provide information on respiration rate, ventilation, oxygen consumption etc. Why to go beyond heart rate? Additional information to heart rate level can enhance the accuracy of the intensity estimation. The accuracy can be especially increased in interval type training, because heart rate doesn’t react linearly with real oxygen consumption. To see how much the accuracy can be increased by using the HRV derived information in addition to HR, please check validation studies: Firstbeat Technologies - Download Research Papers |
| |||||
| rr interval Quote:
To discuss what and how the suunto use this rr interval there are still many unanswered questions in my posts. I will put them to you again 1] Quote:
Answer : The same number of times any other heart rate monitor company does like cardiosport or polar nothing unique with suunto. 2] Quote:
Answer: rrintervals or in other words the heart rate is averaged over a 5 minute period and the average RR Interval is taken to calculate epoc. beat to beat heart rate variability is thus neutralised. Quote:
Quote:
How a cell depolarizes and repolarizes is important to understand so i suggest you read up on action potential. Action potential - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia I have read the literature i.e firstbeat technologies. some of what they say contradicts what you say. Pre-prediction of EPOC: A tool for monitoring fatigue accumulation during exercise? by H. Rusko, presented in ACSM Congress, San Francisco, May 28-31, 2003. CONCLUSIONS (1) EPOC can be pre-predicted from data recorded during exercise. (2) Only RR-interval measurement is needed for the preprediction. (3) If blood lactate concentration and actual EPOC can be regarded indicative of fatigue accumulation during exercise then the RR-interval based calculation of EPOCpred can be used as a tool for monitoring the accumulation of fatigue during exercise. (4) Requiring only RR-interval (heart rate) monitoring EPOCpred is especially suitable for field use. (5) The accuracy of the present system can be improved by taking into consideration the individual differences in the relation between fatigue accumulation and the relative exercise intensity. As above. For me going through the literature the suunto watches with their TE or EPOC donot offer anything as the individual variations are vast and one is better off sticking to their heart rate i.e rr interval and seeing which zone they are in and working on that. Than relying on approximations made for them by suunto. The suunto lack one key feature which i was looking for that is recovery to a preset resting heart rate. which will tell you how long you take to get back to a particular resting heart rate you have set after a bout of activity which will give you a good idea of how fit you are getting. I started off trying to convince myself that the suunto was the best and ending up with a cardiosport GT5 and I have no regrets it is simply cool. |
| ||||
| http://dissertations.jyu.fi/studcomp/951391707X.pdf. There everything about RR-I, HRV analysis and EPOC calculation is explained in very detailed. To answer one question: “Is there actually a variable in the EPOC accumulation equation for HRV which causes EPOC to accumulate differently (faster slower at same intensity one day vs. next) based on the fatigue levels in the body?” In simple, the rate of EPOC accumulation is calculated by comparing the changes of the intensity level (%VO2max) in consequent time points. More the intensity changes, more rapidly EPOC accumulates. HRV analysis comes to the question, when estimating the intensity level (using RespR and on- and off-dynamics of the VO2). |
| |||
| Some questions for Jack111: How Cardiosport calculate your preset resting HR?? Hr variability How many monitors can show RRI in the market?? only three brands Are Polar "Own" features validated scientifically?? No Are Suunto features validated?? Yes The main important thing is that all brands use HR variability to make their own features but not all the br |